Contents

Objecting to a Planning Application
1: Planning Law
History
Current Legislation
Interpretation
Delegation
Appeals

2: Local Plan Policies
FBE.2
FBE.3
FT.4

3: Residential Design Guide
Density
Housing Balance
Open Space and Wildlife

4: Grounds for Objection
Highways
Amenity
Policy
Environment

5: Similar Applications

6: The Objection
Layout
Copy to Councillors
Parish Council


7: Property Law
Easements
Easement of Light
Right of Way

8: Planning lexicon

9: The Ombudsman

10: FODDC

11: Links

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Information presented here has been obtained in the course of preparing an (unsuccessful) objection to a hostile application to build on land adjacent to the lower part of our garden. Whilst some of the information is of general application, much is specific to the construction of new properties in the South Forest Area of the Forest of Dean, and to the Policies of the Forest of Dean District Council.

None of the information presented here should be considered as advice as to a particular course of action when objecting to a planning application. In particular, where issues of Law or Finance are involved, an objector is encouraged to seek professional advice.

It is hoped that this site may provide a starting point in preparing an objection. The 21 day consultation period does not allow for much time to research Planning and Legal matters, whereas the developer has had many years of experience. In essence, this site contains some of the information I wish I had had access to when the notification of the Planning Application arrived in the Post!

As an objector it is important not to expect to be successful. The LPA and elected members of the planning committee will give you the impression that they are listening to your views and concerns; Planning officers will advise you of the documents that determine their decisions – The Local Plan, the Residential Design Guide and the Highways Requirements for Development, and may even help you in preparing your letter of objection. They will then make their decision which will appear to be based on whether, if permission were refused, the applicant would succeed at appeal and win costs against the Council or, if granted, an objector may succeed in a complaint through the Ombudsman. Since the likelihood of the latter is low, and the penalties imposed by the Ombudsman small (and not mandatory), it is most likely that permission will be granted. Bear in mind that political considerations will also influence the decision. The following is a quotation from a County councillor:

"One of the more outrageous follies that emerged was that the F.O.D. district council ended up with a policy of building more houses than could possibly be required.  The excuse was that this would re activate the local economy!  More commuters in reality.  Thinking is something that does not come easily to them."

Unknown to you, the employed officers of the authority will discuss matters with the developer which may make the impact of the development even worse; They may, for instance, encourage the developer to increase the proposed density of housing, or to try to acquire additional land in order to enlarge the development. You will not be informed of these discussions and they will only be recorded if carried out by an exchange of letters. Even then, you will have to ask to see the FULL planning file (not just the one that contains the application) in order to see them. This usually requires that you make an appointment several days in advance.

Once a decision to approve has been made, the Authority may  apply conditions but because the developer can appeal against conditions he may think unfair,  these will be carefully chosen. Any requirements that may have mitigated in favor of a refusal will be overlooked (or transformed into optional ‘guidance’) A decision notice will be sent to the applicant, but you will have to pay £10 for your copy.

From this point on communication becomes almost impossible. I am fairly certain that this LPA has a policy of not responding to letters which ask how decisions are arrived at unless they begin with the word ‘Complaint’, (I sent 3 which went unanswered) particularly if you question obvious inconsistencies in the decisions. Of course, an authority that has reached a decision is hardly likely to admit that it is in error, so your complaint will be rejected.

Where it is obvious that planning requirements (such as compliance with local plan policies) have not been met, then an appeal to the Ombudsman may seem to be the only course of action (A Judicial review costs upwards of £40,000). Again, do not expect to be successful. The Ombudsman will only carry out an investigation where he or she judges that a Councils' behavior is ‘utterly unreasonable’. The Ombudsman does not define ‘utterly unreasonable’ but it must be a very high hurdle. Certainly, failing to comply with Local Plan policies does not appear to qualify. The Ombudsman publishes a document for Councils entitled ‘Good Administrative Practice’, and a number of case histories which appear to show that even minor transgressions meet with criticism and rectification. These suggest the requirement for high standards of compliance with policies and guidance but they are clearly written by a different Ombudsman from the one that will consider and almost certainly reject your complaint.

 If you have a Conservative M.P. or prospective M.P., it may be worth trying to enlist their support as they appear to have made a policy commitment to prevent inappropriate infill development. See:

Labour, however, are unmoved by such opposition. In a recent debate in the Commons (see Hansard, near the bottom of the page) Ms Yvette Cooper, Parliamentary Secretary of State at the Office of the deputy Prime Minister thinks that design can overcome inappropriate development:

"The hon. Member for Poole made slightly more thoughtful points about increasing density undermining the character of certain areas, but planning policy statement 3 and PPS1 strongly stress the importance of design. Local planning authorities, frankly, should take a much more assertive approach to the quality of developments, the quality of life in an area and design issues. Greater density does not necessarily produce a decline in the quality of life—quite the reverse."

This is what we are up against!

The following UK websites also deal with objecting to planning applications:

www.mcspotlight.org/campaigns/current/residents/planning.html

The Forest of Dean District Council's "Development Control Charter" can be found at www.fdean.gov.uk under 'Planning and Building Control->Development Control'

If you have a website related to planning matters that I can add to this list, please email me at planned.off@btopenworld.com

Where this symbol appears, click on it to see background information and comment (You will need a Javascript capable browser to view this information)

If you have read all of the material presented here and still believe in Father Christmas, then do not follow this link!

And if you have avoided cutting your wrists after all of the above, I strongly recommend the following: http://www.rottenborough.info/index.html which will assure you that you are not alone!

This site was last updated on 12-Mar-2005.